LOL LIGO! Faking data? Blind injections? The only LIGO “signal” was “detected” before LIGO was officially turned on and when nobody was watching nor monitoring the LIGO detectors and computers! LIGO designed to be duped by “blind injections” and bogus evidence of gravitational waves.

Weiss said, “We accepted that the most economical explanation was that it really is a black-hole pair.”  Yes!  That is definitely the “most economical explanation” as it is worth a couple billion more taxpayer dollars!

LOL LIGO! Faking data? Blind injections? The only LIGO “signal” was “detected” before LIGO was officially turned on and when nobody was watching nor monitoring the LIGO detectors and computers! LIGO designed to be duped by “blind injections” and bogus evidence of gravitational waves.

https://around.uoregon.edu/longform/uo-team-helps-catch-gravity-wave reports:

“The signal came in about 45 minutes after Anamaria and I left,” Schofield said. “If I had been in the control room, I wouldn’t have seen it. It lasted one-tenth of a second. Had I been in the control room an alarm would have sounded, and I could have seen it by looking back at the data. But I was at my motel.”

LOL!  Nobody was watching the machines, computers, and detectors!  What security devices were in place to make sure nobody was contaminating the data?  Was anyone in the building?  Was Elvis there?  Were the servers be hacked?  Who runs security on the building and servers?  Are there logs?  And why no replications of the results?  Science must be reproducible, or it’s not science!

LIGO’s one and only “observation” was made while the “researchers” were back at the Motel, after having left LIGO on during an unofficial test run!  LOL!

And the big question is “Hows comes LIGO only detects gravity waves when nobody is watching? LOL LIGO!”  Are they going to invoke Schrodinger’s Cat and claim the Nobel for Quantum Gravity too?   With all the dozens of LIGO events forecast for each month following that September 2015 “observation,” why was did the only “signal” ever happen when “nobody” was there?

And too, let us not forget that the LIGO setup was designed with the capability of being intentionally deceived!

The New Yorker reports:

This time through, the blind-injection group swore that they had nothing to do with the signal. Marco Drago thought that their denials might also be part of the test, but Reitze, himself a member of the quartet, had a different concern. “My worry was—and you can file this under the fact that we are just paranoid cautious about making a false claim—could somebody have done this maliciously?” he said. “Could somebody have somehow faked a signal in our detector that we didn’t know about?” Reitze, Weiss, González, and a handful of others considered who, if anyone, was familiar enough with both the apparatus and the algorithms to have spoofed the system and covered his or her tracks. There were only four candidates, and none of them had a plausible motive. “We grilled those guys,” Weiss said. “And no, they didn’t do it.” Ultimately, he said, “We accepted that the most economical explanation was that it really is a black-hole pair.”

LOL!  They “grilled those guys”!  What about other “guys?”  If one person can fake a result, then multiple folks can!  What if the servers or system were hacked?  What if someone needed tenure?  What if an opportunist saw an opportunity to raise a billion more dollars?  Are there security logs?  Will they be shared?  Will they ever see another signal?

The New Yorker continues: 

Eventually, they confirmed that the detection met the statistical threshold of five sigma, the gold standard for declaring a discovery in physics. This meant that there was a probability of only one in 3.5 million that the signal was spotted by chance.

When the BICEP2 hype went down, the lead “researcher” John Kovac said the same thing–actually he stated that the BICEP results were 3x more certain . . . and they turned out to be fraudulent!

The New York Times Reports: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/03/18/science/space/detection-of-waves-in-space-buttresses-landmark-theory-of-big-bang.html?&_r=0

Dr. Kovac and his collaborators, working in an experiment known as Bicep, for Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization, reported their results in a scientific briefing at the Center for Astrophysics here on Monday and in a set of papers submitted to The Astrophysical Journal.

Dr. Kovac said the chance that the results were a fluke was only one in 10 million.

Dr. Guth, now 67, pronounced himself “bowled over,” saying he had not expected such a definite confirmation in his lifetime.

“With nature, you have to be lucky,” he said. “Apparently we have been lucky.”

The results are the closely guarded distillation of three years’ worth of observations and analysis. Eschewing email for fear of a leak, Dr. Kovac personally delivered drafts of his work to a select few, meeting with Dr. Guth, who is now a professor at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (as is his son, Larry, who was sleeping that night in 1979), in his office last week.

“It was a very special moment, and one we took very seriously as scientists,” said Dr. Kovac, who chose his words as carefully as he tended his radio telescopes.

LOL! Kovac “chose his words as carefully as he tended his radio telescopes,” and because he did not notice that his telescopes were aimed at cosmic dust, he did not notice that all of his words and claims were naught but dust.

And so you see how BIG PHYSICS works today. Dishonorable lies, hype, incompetence, inflated claims, bolstered by faux press releases and TV shows–the very opposite of the Scientific Soul embodied by the likes of Bohr, Newton, Galileo, Einstein, Feynman, and Copernicus.

LOL LIGO! The only LIGO “signal” was “detected” before LIGO was officially turned on and when nobody was watching nor monitoring the LIGO detectors and computers! LIGO designed to be duped by “blind injections” and bogus evidence of gravitational waves.

It is becoming more and more clear why LIGO didn’t wait for a second “signal.”  It seems they were beginning to doubt that they would ever seen one again, now that the LIGO experiment was actually turned on and they were actually watching it.

And so the LIGO TEAM pulled a fraudulent HAIL MARY press conference, going all in on one tiny, dubious, spurious, and non-reproducible “result” which “happened” during a test run with nobody watching, while invoking the pseudoscience of Cosmic Strings and Inflation so as to ensure billions more in funding.

LOL LIGO!

Why not wait for results when folks are actually watching the LIGO apparatus and it is actually tuned on?  Oh wait–because there are no signals under those conditions.

LOL LIGO!!

The New Yorker describes science’s finest hour:

This time through, the blind-injection group swore that they had nothing to do with the signal. Marco Drago thought that their denials might also be part of the test, but Reitze, himself a member of the quartet, had a different concern. “My worry was—and you can file this under the fact that we are just paranoid cautious about making a false claim—could somebody have done this maliciously?” he said. “Could somebody have somehow faked a signal in our detector that we didn’t know about?” Reitze, Weiss, González, and a handful of others considered who, if anyone, was familiar enough with both the apparatus and the algorithms to have spoofed the system and covered his or her tracks. There were only four candidates, and none of them had a plausible motive. “We grilled those guys,” Weiss said. “And no, they didn’t do it.” Ultimately, he said, “We accepted that the most economical explanation was that it really is a black-hole pair.”

LOL LIGO!!!!  “I swear I didn’t inject a fake signal!  You might never see another one, but I swear I didn’t inject a fake signal while nobody was watching, while everyone was back at the motel.”  LOL LIGO!!!!

Weiss said, “We accepted that the most economical explanation was that it really is a black-hole pair.”  Yes!  That is definitely the “most economical explanation” as it is worth a billion more taxpayer dollars!

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “LOL LIGO! Faking data? Blind injections? The only LIGO “signal” was “detected” before LIGO was officially turned on and when nobody was watching nor monitoring the LIGO detectors and computers! LIGO designed to be duped by “blind injections” and bogus evidence of gravitational waves.

  1. The LIGO might just be detecting the gravitational “wobble” that Newton also would fully expect as the black holes circle each other, successively coming closer and going farther away from the earth. No surprise to Newton there.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s